Official websites use .mil
Secure .mil websites use HTTPS
If you would like to be notified when new solicitations are posted, please fill out our interest form here.
For more information on responding to a solicitation, see our NAVWAR CSO Resource guide.
8. Which specific warfighter tasks, mission workflows, and tactical-network use cases should be prioritized for the prototype?
The Government is not seeking a solution that is specific to a Warfighter task, workflow, or use case. The Government is seeking a solution capable of addressing the primary and desired attributes in the AoI for various warfighting scenarios.
9. Which user roles, organizations, experience levels, and operating locations are expected to use the EPSS during the prototype?
The Government anticipates that the selected solution will support System Administrators, Operators, and maintainers roles, experience levels, and operating locations afloat and ashore.
10. Can the Government provide additional details on:
- How many users, concurrent users, workstations, and deployment locations should the prototype and Rough Order of Magnitude estimate assume?
- What response-time and performance thresholds must be supported?
- Which categories of PII and PHI will be stored?
- What are the data auditing requirements?
- Is there a prescribed target hardware and deployment architecture?
- Will CUI be provided to Offerors and what are the handling requirements?
- What user roles and authorization levels must be implemented?
- What test data, scenarios, and acceptance criteria will be used?
- What are the requirements for graceful degradation and recovery?
- What system/data security requirements must be met?
Initial assessment will focus on primary and desired attributes as defined in the AoI. The Government will provide additional details to Offerors who are selected to proceed to Phase 2, Pitches.
11. What operating systems, workstation types, CPU/GPU configurations, and other target hardware baselines must the solution support? Are the stated limits of less than 8 GB storage, less than 6 GB VRAM/RAM, and less than 30-watt CPU draw mandatory thresholds or desired objectives?
The specifications defined in the AoI are industry standards and should be treated as minimum compute and store requirements.
12. What organizational data sources are approved for grounding, including expected document types, formats, data volumes, languages, classification levels, and update frequency?
The Government anticipates that data sources will include technical documentation, multi-media, and software-based tools or repositories with file types including, but not limited, to MS Office suite files, Adobe products, and standard video file formats.
13. Will the Government provide the initial document corpus, metadata, technical terminology, and organizational nomenclature needed to build and evaluate the RAG knowledge base?
The Government will provide information and artifacts to those who are selected for prototyping.
14. How should the system resolve conflicting, obsolete, duplicate, or incomplete source documents, and will the Government identify which sources are authoritative?
The Government will provide only authoritative documentation and information and provide updated artifacts, as needed.
15. Who will approve new content for ingestion, and what review, release, and update process should the active RAG pipeline support?
The Government will provide new content as required.
16. What citation format and level of source granularity are required for generated responses, and what should the system display when no authorized, sufficiently grounded answer is available?
The goal of the AoI is to seek innovative commercial products and/or solutions from industry on capability and services requested. The Government will not provide next steps or advice.
17. What are the required Severity 1 and Severity 2 response, workaround, restoration, and rollback times; required support hours; low-bandwidth diagnostic constraints; and process for delivering the required 14-day CVE remediation packages to air-gapped systems?
See Government response to question number 0010.
18. What prototype duration, milestones, demonstration environment, Government-provided data or equipment, success criteria, pricing period, licensing assumptions, data-rights expectations, and anticipated teaming or integration requirements should vendors use for the Phase 1 solution brief and Phase 2 pitch?
Phase 1 should focus on the primary and desired attributes outlined in the AOI letter. The Government will provide additional details to Offerors who are selected to proceed to Phase 2, Pitches.
19. Is this requirement related to the MyNavy HR modernization effort?
No, this is not related to the MyNavy HR effort.
20. What is the anticipated funding range for the initial GenAI EPSS effort?
At Phase 2, selected vendors are expected to provide a preliminary cost estimate and commercial pricing model.
21. Hardware-Constrained Inference:
- Specs are given for HW. Is this existing HW that the SW Solution will be deployed to or can new HW be considered.
- If existing system, are the included HW constraints the only data available and will it vary per install
The Government will consider alternative hardware solutions. Specifications and/or constraints will vary by platform type. Note: The specifications defined in the AoI are industry standards and should be treated as minimum compute and store requirements.
22. Does the active SAM registration requirement apply only to the entity submitting the Phase 1 solution brief as the offeror or prime contractor, or must every named subcontractor and teaming member also have active SAM registration?
All Offerors including subcontractors need active SAM registrations at the time of submission.
23. Will Solution Briefs be evaluated on the Primary Attributes alone, or will the Desired Attributes also be evaluated? If both, is there a relative weighting between them?
The Government will evaluate on both Primary and Desired attributes. Primary attributes carry higher weighting.
23. Is the capability described in this AOI intended to operate independently, or to interoperate with existing Department enterprise artificial intelligence services?
The Government anticipates eventual interoperation with other DoD Solutions.
24. Is this intended to replace an existing EPSS or augment current training and support systems?
The GenAI EPSS solution will augment current training and support systems.
25. Beyond ingesting existing documentation, does the Government anticipate a need to restructure or author content for point-of-need use (e.g., decomposing manuals into procedural, decision-point, and troubleshooting formats)? Is that content engineering expected to be vendor-provided?
Yes, the Government will require Vendors to engineer content.
26. Will the Government support access to representative fleet personnel for evaluation during the prototype phase?
Yes, Government personnel will be involved in evaluation during Phase 3, Prototyping.
27. Post-fielding, how does the Government intend to monitor whether the EPSS is achieving reduced cognitive workload and accelerated technology adoption? Is continuous effectiveness evaluation anticipated within operations and sustainment?
The Government anticipates monitoring this during Phase 3, Prototyping.
28. How does the Government scope "relevant environment" for this AOI: does a prototype demonstrated in another Government or federal operational environment satisfy the attribute, or must the solution have been tested on a Navy tactical network or an equivalent afloat configuration? Additionally, is the TRL 6 determination made against the integrated solution as a whole, or attribute by attribute?
The TRL 6 will be evaluated as a whole. A relevant environment includes environments outside of a lab environment.
29. The Area of Interest states that award will be made in accordance with the CSO process detailed within N00039-25-S-0001 and refers respondents to that announcement for the three-phase process and response instructions. Would the Government confirm where the current version of N00039-25-S-0001, and any amendments, may be obtained?
N00039-25-S-0001 is available on SAM.gov.